🔗 Share this article

Trump’s most recent warning to impose an extra complete levy on items imported from China has been described as a “classic case” of American hypocrisy, according to the Beijing administration.

A Commerce Ministry spokesperson further commented that the nation could implement its own undisclosed “responsive actions” if the US President executes his pledge, adding that the country was “not afraid” of a looming trade war.

This past Friday, Trump retaliated at the Chinese government’s action to reinforce its policies for overseas sales of rare earths, alleging Beijing of “adopting a confrontational stance” and attempting to hold the international market “captive”.

Furthermore, he threatened to pull out of a planned talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, which was set for a conference in the Republic of Korea later this month.

His statements on that day shook stock exchanges, with the benchmark US stock index dropping over two and a half percent, marking its biggest drop since earlier this year.

These statements revived fears of a trade war between the United States and China.

This past spring, the both nations had agreed to drop significant levies on each other’s products, which had created the possibility of commerce ceasing between the two nations.

Consequently, American import duties on Chinese imports facing an extra thirty percent tariff compared with the year’s onset, while American products entering China face a ten percent duty.

China’s latest remarks – published by the Ministry of Commerce in the form of formal replies to press queries – mirrored terminology from the zenith of the latest commercial tensions.

The remarks condemned American limits on exports on electronic components while supporting Beijing’s export controls on rare earth minerals as “routine measures” to protect domestic safety and that of every country.

The official remarked that for “many years”, the United States had “expanded the interpretation” of state security, exploited overseas sale restrictions and “implemented” discriminatory practices against China.

“Turning to” import duty warnings is not the proper method to engage with China,” their representative said.

“China’s position on a tariff war has always been consistent: we are not seeking one, but we are not afraid of one.”

Recently, the Chinese government declared it was tightening export controls on key elements and additional substances essential to advanced tech manufacturing.

This move was regarded as a important measure, as the state processes about 90% of the planet’s critical minerals, which are employed in goods such as renewable energy components and mobile phones.

The recent comments from both governments are being viewed by observers as a means of strengthening positions ahead of upcoming negotiations.

Remains uncertain whether a summit between Donald Trump and China’s leader, expected at a high-level meeting in Seoul in the coming weeks, will take place as planned.